By JULIETTE ROSSANT
One, two, three, four I declare a Foie Gras War Now that the dust is settling on the last round in the Foie Gras War, let's review the near past for a moment and then take stock of the situation. One might say that the Foie Gras War was well underway by July 2004, when CNN Money recognized the issue in an article entitled "Crisis in the foie gras biz."
In September 2004, "Gubernator" Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a law forbidding foie gras production and sale in California by 2012, a move whose opposition included Todd English (see previous article and SB 1520 of 2003-4. Also, read PETA's celebration.)
In March 2005, New York stepped up its foie gras offensive. The New York State Assembly introduced Bill No. 6212--A, sponsored by assemblymember John J. McEneny (104th Assembly District), to "amend the agriculture and markets law, in relation to making it unlawful to force feed birds under certain circumstances." The bill includes language in S353-c which "Makes it unlawful to force feed birds by intubation for the purpose of enlarging the liver of such birds." As of April 25, 2005, the bill's status is amended and returned to reconsideration by the agriculture committee. A version in New York State Senate is supported by senator John J. Bonacic.
Then, in April 2005, with a movie-mocking title "Liver and Let Live" in The Chicago Tribune, an Entertainment reporter force-fed us further controversy. The subtitle said it all: "Charlie Trotter now says force-feeding ducks to create foie gras is a cruel, bird-brained idea. Rick Tramonto says he is a hypocrite."
This month, Newsweek magazine got into the act this month (see May 2nd issue, "A Flap over Foie Gras"): ...Within an hour of Cardinal Ratzinger's recent elevation as Pope Benedictus XVI, an exultant e-mail went out from Bruce Friedrich, director of vegan campaigns for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), calling media attention to the new pope's views on animal husbandry. In a 2002 interview, Ratzinger opined that "degrading living creatures to a commodity," specifically by force-feeding geese and confining chickens in crowded factory-farm cages, seems "to contradict the relationship of mutuality that comes across in the Bible." Why all this venting of spleen over bloated goose or duck liver? Part of it, of course, it just hype and poor reportage. After all, having pitting Trotter against Tramonto, how could The Chicago Tribune's report have failed to get more of the story? Mark Caro -- an Entertainment reporter, not a Food or Restaurant reporter -- glibly said "Trotter said he stopped including foie gras on his menus about three years ago but only is talking about the decision now" but then missed the major contradictory news that only two weeks earlier Trotter had served three courses with foie gras during Food & Wine's Best New Chefs party (see The New York Post). Small reward that the Trib got scooped by The New York Post -- meanwhile, chefs and foodies joined the fracas for days and weeks thereafter (see eGullet and Slow Food Forum).
Nevertheless, the Trib article does point out that foie gras has been with us for 5,000 years -- oh, and ducks and geese actually don't feel any pain during le gavage.
Ariane Daguin of D'Artagnan, an importer, wholesaler, and retailer, which supplies foie gras among other fine foods, refuses to let tripe be stuffed down her throat. She related to me the stance of Alain Ducasse: line fishing can be far more cruel. When a fish is hooked ona line, it gasps for breath in agony (unless you clobber it on the head). All they say is "Poor ducks!"... [but] ducks do force feed themselves while migrating. These are healthy, not diseased, livers. [Also] the cuticle inside the neck (when they are force fed by tube) has no sense of feeling, so they are not in pain. What PETA wants, she claims, is to ban eating meat altogether.: foie gras is just an easy target, because it is an elitist food -- and because Americans look upon the eating of an organ like liver as something weird.
Meanwhile, things are moving quickly among anti-foie gras activists. Illinois, Massachusetts, and Oregon are all following California’s example and considering laws banning the production and/or the sale of foie gras. New York could pass a law as early as June 2005, according to Daguin, to ban production.
"The wording of the California law could be applied to ban most poultry raised in America"... Daguin pointed out that the wording of the California law could be applied to ban most poultry raised in America, since most turkey and chicken are fed more than they would foraging for themselves. She contacted the Poultry and Egg Council, but when “I told them that in seven years you won’t be able to eat meat in the California, all they did is laugh at me.”
By the way, PETA for one has not overlooked Ducasse's wisdom: they have already started a national campaign called "Fishing Hurts" to stop fishing because "fish are smart, interesting animals with their own unique personalities." Such antics have already earned them mention twice on the CBS Evening News, once back in November 2004 and then again just last month in April 2005.
Daguin is not waiting for animal activists to walk away with hook, line, and sinker. With New York’s two foie gras producers, she has hired a lobbyist to stop the onslaught. And she has started a fund to support this counter-lobbying activity (click here to read more).
Will other chefs who serve foie gras get involved? Daguin thinks not: "They don’t want to jeopardize the vegetarian wife of a tycoon [client]," while PETA & Co. have been lining up big celebrities to toot their horn.
Stay tuned; this war is not over yet by a long stretch.
Previous articles: Foie Gras War From Boulud's gourmet hamburgers arise... delicate Philly cheesesteaks? Super Chef vs. Governator: Todd English Fights For Foie Gras Rights
Technorati Tags: superchefblog, Juliette Rossant, super chef, celebrities, chefs, food, restaurants, cooking, branding, cuisine, foie gras, New York, California
--> back to superchefblog
|